By the end of the 1990s, America had a new bipartisan political consensus. While during the New Deal and Great Society eras, Americans broadly believed that the government should protect at least a minimum standard of living for the broad population, this new bipartisan consensus centered a few, not-so-new core beliefs.
First: that hunger and poverty are a symptom of personal failings by those who struggle. Second: that government had no role to play in solving the issue, since the problem was one based in personal responsibility, not structural challenges. And finally, that where there were gaps, charities could meet the need.
Pictured here are then-Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and Senator Bob Dole with President Bill Clinton and Vice President Al Gore, agreeing to the structures of “welfare reform.”
Museum Map
WISHING
TREE
The Proof is in Our History
- 1.Welcome
- 2.Welcome
- 3.The Age of Mass Migration - Landing
- 4.The Age of Mass Migration - Main
- 5.Immigration from Europe
- 6.Early Activists
- 7.The Great Depression
- 8.Charity Is Not Enough
- 9.Hunger is No One's Fault
- 10.The New Deal
- 11.Political Compromises
- 12.An Unequal Recovery
- 13.Back Door Exclusions
- 14.Hunger, Justice, and Civil Rights - Landing
- 15.Hunger, Justice, and Civil Rights - Main
- 16.The Walk for Decent Welfare
- 17.Televising the War on Hunger - Landing
- 18.Televising the War on Hunger - Main
- 19.Hunger in America
- 20.The Great Society
- 21.Bipartisan Consensus
- 22.Nixon Works to End Hunger
- 23.The Unmaking of the Great Society - Landing
- 24.The Unmaking of the Great Society - Main
- 25.President Reagan
- 26.The Myth of the Welfare Queen
- 27.Cementing Stereotypes into Policy
- 28.A New Bipartisan Consensus
- 29.Where We Are Now - Landing
- 30.Where We Are Now - Main
- 31.The Pandemic
- 32.Patching our Safety Net
- 33.Our Wish for the Future
- 34.End tour
Welcome to the Hunger Museum, a virtual project of MAZON.